DMI 57 - Multiplanar Imaging - Stage 5 - Kyle Thornton

Assessment

Assessment Methods
  • Analysis of exam, quiz, or homework items linked to specific SLOs
  • Assignments based on rubrics (such as essays, projects, and performances)
  • Direct observation of performances, practical exams, group work
Assessment DescriptionQuizzes

Examinations

Group presentations

Solo presentations
Learning OutcomesAll
Number of Sections1
Number of Instructors2
Number of Students16

Data Analysis

Data Shared With
  • Instructors of the same course (at CCSF)
  • Faculty and staff within our department
  • Faculty and staff from related programs/departments
  • Students
  • External agencies
Data Sharing Methods
  • Face-to-face meetings
  • Email
  • Shared document files
Data SummaryThere was great improvement from past semesters.

Students demonstrated superior problem solving and critical thinking skills.

The class average on the solo presentations was 24 out of 25. The solo presentations required synthesis of course material, project planning, then, presenting the material in a clear and concise manner.

The average score on combined quizzes taken in class was 82%, also up from previous semesters.

The combined score on examinations was 77%. This was about equal to performance on examinations from previous years.
Analysis SummaryThe benchmark for all activities was 80%.

At 77%, the outcome of the examinations was slightly less than this benchmark.

These examination scores were offset by the superior subject matter understanding students displayed during their solo presentations.
Next Steps PlannedUpon reflection, the instructors determined that students did very well during participatory events during class, but not as well on examinations.

The results of the examinations truly did not appear to accurately reflect the knowledge of the material, as well as how students were able to synthesize the material on their own.

Students stated they were confused by questions.

Also, students felt they might do better if the questions were grouped by anatomic region, rather than anatomic region.

The course material lends itself well to project and problem-based learning; therefore, more activities of that nature will be planned.
Learning OutcomesAll

Changes

DetailsA capstone project was designed in lieu of a final examination. Students presented their findings to the rest of the class.
Learning OutcomesAll

Tentative Future Plans

TermSpring 2014
Activities
  • Assessment (measurement) of outcomes
  • Implementation of planned changes and reassessment
More DetailsCapstone project at end of semester.

Self-guided examinations that students can take outside of class.

SLO Details Storage Location

Additional Highlights

The quality of the solo anatomic structure presentations using a multiplanar imaging modality, such as ultrasound, MRI or CT were outstanding. The students brought a high level of enthusiasm to this assignment.

The presentations surpassed the instructors' expectations. Furthermore, the presentations made learning enjoyable. The progress students made was palpable.

Back to Department Overview