PHYC 4A: Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Stage 5
Leilah McCarthy

Basic Information

Number of Outcomes9
Number of Outcomes Assessed8
Assessment FrequencyEvery semester
Analysis FrequencyEvery semester
Detail LinkLink

Course Information

Number of Course Sections5
Number of Instructors3

Improvement Details

DetailsNew teaching methods were implemented, including the use of personal response systems and discourse management.

The assessment was modified to include questions that required calculus.

Assessment Methods

MethodsA common 10-question test was given to students from all PHYC 4A sections. This test was similar to the one used in spring 2013, but was changed to include questions that required the use of calculus.

Assessment Data Discussion and Analysis

TermSpring 2013
How and With Whomfaculty teaching the same course, other faculty in the department
Number Assessed98
Data SummaryCriteria: " A significant majority of students should be able to answer each question correctly."

SLOs that need improvement:

SLO A: Although over half (55%) of the students answered the dimensional analysis question correctly, this is an essential basic skill and we hope to improve this in the future.

SLO B: The students continue to struggle with analyzing 2-dimensional problems using vectors. (45% answered correctly)

SLO E: Although over half (60%) of the students answered the conservation of energy question correctly, this is a fundamental concept and we hope to improve this in the future.

SLO F: The students tend to incorrectly assume that all collisions are elastic. (37% answered correctly)

Satisfactory results:

SLO C: The students did very well predicting the future trajectory of an object (86% correct).

SLO D: Although the students struggle with 2-dimensional problems, they seem to generally be able to apply Newton's Laws. (69% correct)

SLO G: Students did well solving problems symbolically. (71% correct)

SLO H: Students did well analyzing problems graphically. (72% correct)
Planned ImprovementsNew teaching techniques are being experimented with, including the use of personal response systems and discourse management.
Program Review LinkNo answer

Future Plans

TermSpring 2014
ActivitiesRevision of outcomes and assessment methods (measurements), Assessment (measurement) of outcomes, Analysis and discussion of assessment data and next steps, Implementation of planned changes and reassessment
DetailsThe current outline has 9 SLOs. It was determined that some of these were redundant and could be consolidated and 1 of them was inappropriate and not something that was expected of the students. A new course outline with only 3 SLOs has been submitted to the Curriculum Committee. The same assessment method from fall 2013 will be used in spring 2014.
HighlightsNo answer

Back to Overview