DMI 50B - Radiological Physics and Equipment - Stage 5 - Kyle Thornton

Assessment

Assessment Methods
  • Analysis of exam, quiz, or homework items linked to specific SLOs
  • Assignments based on rubrics (such as essays, projects, and performances)
  • Direct observation of performances, practical exams, group work
Assessment DescriptionGroup presentation involving the design and demonstration of a rudimentary working generator, motor or transformer.

Lab practical involving demonstration of a set of skills to obtain a diagnostic quality radiograph.

Lab final exam involving the analysis of x-ray images to determine the diagnostic value of each, and how to amend the procedures for any errors.
Learning OutcomesAll
Number of Sections1
Number of Instructors1
Number of Students18

Data Analysis

Data Shared With
  • Faculty and staff within our department
  • Faculty and staff from related programs/departments
  • Students
  • External agencies
Data Sharing Methods
  • Face-to-face meetings
  • Email
  • Shared document files
Data SummaryThe average score on the midterm lab practical was 96% indicating a superior demonstration of the procedures necessary to produce a diagnostic radiograph.

The average score on the lab final exam was 63%. This indicated a very poor understanding of the material. The questions were difficult, which could indicate the questions were misunderstood rather than the actual material. Student often tend to subscribe to a "rule-in" rather than "rule-out" process with multiple choice questions on exams. Often, it has been observed that students attempt to make every one of the choices the correct answer, rather than ruling them out.
Analysis SummaryBenchmarks were set to measure achievements of each SLO.

For example:

Lab practical - the class average is 80% or better

Lab final - the class average is 80% or better

Group presentation - the class average is 90% or better
Next Steps PlannedMore time to analyze images. Students did not feel confident in this area. A worksheet would helpful.
Learning OutcomesThe class average for the lab final exam is 80% or better. This tests the students ability to analyze, contrast and compare images for diagnostic value, and determine what corrective actions, if any, need to be taken to amend the quality of the image.

Tentative Future Plans

TermFall 2013
Activities
  • Assessment (measurement) of outcomes
  • Analysis and discussion of assessment data and next steps
More DetailsThe plan is to conduct periodic observation, and testing to assess and analyze SLO data.

SLO Details Storage Location

Additional Highlights

The average score on the midterm lab practical was the highest since this instrument was implemented. In the past, some students have failed this event. This semester, all students not only passed, but did exceptionally well.

Back to Department Overview