MUS 24 - Music of East Asia - Stage 5 - Benedict Lim
Assessment
Assessment Methods | - Analysis of exam, quiz, or homework items linked to specific SLOs
- Assignments based on rubrics (such as essays, projects, and performances)
- Direct observation of performances, practical exams, group work
- Student self-assessments (such as reflective journals and surveys)
- Student satisfaction surveys
|
---|
Assessment Description | Students were asked to articulate significant differences between East Asian and American (U.S.) music in terms of tonal structures, instrumentation and aesthetics. |
---|
Learning Outcomes | ALL |
---|
Number of Sections | 3 |
---|
Number of Instructors | 1 |
---|
Number of Students | ~70 |
---|
Data Analysis
Data Shared With | - Faculty and staff within our department
- Students
|
---|
Data Sharing Methods | - Face-to-face meetings
- Email
- Phone
- Shared document files
|
---|
Data Summary | ~75% of students were able to distinguish the main musical characteristics of historical periods in China, Japan and Korea. |
---|
Analysis Summary | Students achieved outcomes if they were able to answer 80% of questions about selected East Asian music and dance styles. |
---|
Next Steps Planned | No answer |
---|
Learning Outcomes | No answer |
---|
Changes
Details | I updated my SLOs to conform with the current rubric. |
---|
Learning Outcomes | ALL |
---|
Tentative Future Plans
Term | Fall 2013 |
---|
Activities | Assessment (measurement) of outcomes |
---|
More Details | I will assess the revised SLOs using both written exams and oral in-class participation. |
---|
SLO Details Storage Location
- HARD COPY - In my personal filing system (my office)
- HARD COPY - In a department filing system (department office)
- ELECTRONIC COPY - In my electronic filing system (hard drive or web server)
Additional Highlights
Much robust dialogue with my colleagues. We came to understand the various issues we all have in common as instructors.
Back to Department Overview