CAD 180 - intro to technical drawing - Stage 1 - Tom Angeloff
Assessment
| Assessment Methods |
|
|---|---|
| Assessment Description | 4 quizzes were given. Of these, 3 were repeated (slight changes made, unannounced). Marked improvement was made. Highest grade was recorded. For the mid-term, students who did not achieve a grade of 70 or more were given an opportunity to re-take the exam (slight changes were made to the original exam). All students oped to re-take. All did marked better...the highest of the two was recorded. Before the final exam was given, I verbally asked the students questions concerning the format of the course, class assignments, quizzes, mid-term, pace of course and grading scheme to guage their satisfaction in order to help me with making changes which may make the course more meaningful to the students. |
| Learning Outcomes | all |
| Number of Sections | 1 |
| Number of Instructors | 1 |
| Number of Students | 18 |
Data Analysis
| Data Shared With | Students |
|---|---|
| Data Sharing Methods | Face-to-face meetings |
| Data Summary | Students were aware individually notified of their improvement in quiz and test results. At the end of the semester, students suggested course evaluation and content changes. Comments were noted |
| Analysis Summary | All the students made significant improvement upon re-quizzing or testing |
| Next Steps Planned | Improvements suggested that I emphasise certain aspects of the course content more effectively (longer time on lecture, re-evaluating effectiveness of questions I asked and scope of content) |
| Learning Outcomes | all |
Tentative Future Plans
| Term | Fall 2013 |
|---|---|
| Activities | Assessment (measurement) of outcomes |
| More Details | No answer |
SLO Details Storage Location
HARD COPY - In a department filing system (department office)