DANC 126B - Intensive Modern Dance - Stage 5 - Sean Laughlin

Assessment

Assessment Methods
  • Assignments based on rubrics (such as essays, projects, and performances)
  • Direct observation of performances, practical exams, group work
  • Student self-assessments (such as reflective journals and surveys)
  • Student satisfaction surveys
Assessment DescriptionMeans: Course Embedded Test

Criteria: 75% of the students will average a 3 or better on a scale of 1-5 (1 being the lowest and 5

Means: Course Embedded Test

Criteria: 75% of the students will average a 3 or better on a scale of 1-5 (1 being the lowest and 5

Means: Course Embedded Test

Criteria: 75% of the students will average a 3 or better on a scale of 1-5 (1 being the lowest and 5
Learning OutcomesAll
Number of Sections1
Number of Instructors1
Number of Students20

Data Analysis

Data Shared With
  • Instructors of the same course (at CCSF)
  • Faculty and staff within our department
Data Sharing Methods
  • Face-to-face meetings
  • Email
  • Website review and commentary
Data Summary100% success for SLO of Increase muscular strength, endurance, and flexibility; balance, coordination, agility, and breath awareness while turning, traveling, and performing level changes as manifested in torso articulations, spiral/twist, tilt, fold, arch, and runs or triplets.

100% success for SLO of Demonstrate in context of a professional level combination correct alignment and execution of: Plié, relevé, 1st through 5th position standing (parallel/turned out) and sitting, low extension, brushes.

100% success for SLO of Demonstrate proper turning technique in three intermediate turns, complex weight changes.
Analysis SummaryNo change this semester- Students are working at satisfactory level there is no reason to change SLO, or pedagogic techniques. However an assessment criterion level was changed to 1-3 - versus 1-5. New assessment will read "75% of the students will average a 2 or better on a scale of 1-3 (1 being the lowest and 3 the highest."

No change this semester- Students are working at satisfactory level there is no reason to change SLO, or pedagogic techniques. However an assessment criterion level was changed to 1-3 - versus 1-5. New assessment will read "75% of the students will average a 2 or better on a scale of 1-3 (1 being the lowest and 3 the highest."

No change this semester- Students are working at satisfactory level there is no reason to change SLO, or pedagogic techniques. However an assessment criterion level was changed to 1-3 - versus 1-5. New assessment will read "75% of the students will average a 2 or better on a scale of 1-3 (1 being the lowest and 3 the highest."
Next Steps PlannedNo change this semester- Students are working at satisfactory level there is no reason to change SLO, or pedagogic techniques. However an assessment criterion level was changed to 1-3 - versus 1-5. New assessment will read "75% of the students will average a 2 or better on a scale of 1-3 (1 being the lowest and 3 the highest."

No change this semester- Students are working at satisfactory level there is no reason to change SLO, or pedagogic techniques. However an assessment criterion level was changed to 1-3 - versus 1-5. New assessment will read "75% of the students will average a 2 or better on a scale of 1-3 (1 being the lowest and 3 the highest."

No change this semester- Students are working at satisfactory level there is no reason to change SLO, or pedagogic techniques. However an assessment criterion level was changed to 1-3 - versus 1-5. New assessment will read "75% of the students will average a 2 or better on a scale of 1-3 (1 being the lowest and 3 the highest."
Learning OutcomesAll

Changes

DetailsNo change this semester- Students are working at satisfactory level there is no reason to change SLO, or pedagogic techniques. However an assessment criterion level was changed to 1-3 - versus 1-5. New assessment will read "75% of the students will average a 2 or better on a scale of 1-3 (1 being the lowest and 3 the highest."

No change this semester- Students are working at satisfactory level there is no reason to change SLO, or pedagogic techniques. However an assessment criterion level was changed to 1-3 - versus 1-5. New assessment will read "75% of the students will average a 2 or better on a scale of 1-3 (1 being the lowest and 3 the highest."

No change this semester- Students are working at satisfactory level there is no reason to change SLO, or pedagogic techniques. However an assessment criterion level was changed to 1-3 - versus 1-5. New assessment will read "75% of the students will average a 2 or better on a scale of 1-3 (1 being the lowest and 3 the highest."
Learning OutcomesAll

Tentative Future Plans

TermFall 2013
Activities
  • Assessment (measurement) of outcomes
  • Analysis and discussion of assessment data and next steps
More DetailsMeans: Course Embedded Test

Criteria: 75% of the students will average a 3 or better on a scale of 1-5 (1 being the lowest and 5

Means: Course Embedded Test

Criteria: 75% of the students will average a 3 or better on a scale of 1-5 (1 being the lowest and 5

Means: Course Embedded Test

Criteria: 75% of the students will average a 3 or better on a scale of 1-5 (1 being the lowest and 5

SLO Details Storage Location

Back to Department Overview