FIN 138 - Principles of Investment - Stage 5 - Mario Yrun

Assessment

Assessment Methods
  • Analysis of exam, quiz, or homework items linked to specific SLOs
  • Assignments based on rubrics (such as essays, projects, and performances)
  • Student satisfaction surveys
  • Capstone projects or final summative assignments
Assessment Description1) FOR THE CUMULATIVE FINAL EXAM: all questions for both sections were allocated to a matrix of nine. Each of 3 course outline's SLO's assessed (listed below in 3c) were tested using a rubric of three levels of learning - A) Analyze/Evaluate, B) Understand/Apply and C) Knowledge/Recall. A percentage of students with correct answers for each of nine outcomes is reported in 3e below.
Learning OutcomesFrom the course outline:

SLO "L": Synthesize Pro's/Con's of stock ownership and differentiate between different types of common stock and bond instruments.

SLO "V": Develop an asset allocation scheme that corresponds to specific investment goals, time horizons and risk preferences.

SLO "W" Assess portfolio performance using quantitative measures, market indexes and other benchmarks
Number of Sections2
Number of Instructors2
Number of Students20

Data Analysis

Data Shared With

Instructors of the same course (at CCSF)

Data Sharing Methods
  • Face-to-face meetings
  • Email
  • Phone
Data SummarySLO L / Rubric A - 45%

SLO L / Rubric B - 67%

SLO L / Rubric C - 70%

SLO V / Rubric A - 67%

SLO V / Rubric B - 70%

SLO V / Rubric C - 65%

SLO W / Rubric A - 62%

SLO W / Rubric B - 61%

SLO W / Rubric C - 46%
Analysis SummaryFor SLO L, last semester we targeted better performance for the higher learning level A and B through more activities and a greater lecture time allocation on the pros/cons of stock ownership and security-type differentiation.

This semester, while higher percentages of the classes achieved learning levels B (54% from 45%) and C (70% from 69%) for SLO L , the percentages of the classes that achieved learning level A fell (45% from 54%).

For SLO W, last semester we planned greater focus on rubric level C - portfolio performance quantitative measurement. This semester the data showed a decline in the percentage of students achieving learning level C (46% from 55%).

However, we believe that it may be too soon to draw statistically significant conclusions due to the fact that this semester's class sections were 10 students each.
Next Steps PlannedThe Instructors are still targeting better performance for SLO L through more activities and a greater lecture time allocation on the pros/cons of stock ownership and security-type differentiation. Also, rubric level C for SLO W, portfolio performance quantitative measurement, needs greater focus next semester.
Learning OutcomesSLO "L": Synthesize Pro's/Con's of stock ownership and differentiate between different types of common stock and bond instruments.

SLO "W" Assess portfolio performance using quantitative measures, market indexes and other benchmarks.

Tentative Future Plans

TermFall 2013
Activities
  • Revision of outcomes and assessment methods (measurements)
  • Assessment (measurement) of outcomes
  • Analysis and discussion of assessment data and next steps
  • Implementation of planned changes and reassessment, amend SLO is official course outline of record
More DetailsThe SLOs on the official course outline of record will be streamlined to more clearly map to Program SLOs.

SLO Details Storage Location

Back to Department Overview