POLS 3: Political Theory
Stage 5
Timothy Killikelly
Basic Information
Number of Outcomes | 6 |
---|---|
Number of Outcomes Assessed | 2 |
Assessment Frequency | Every semester |
Analysis Frequency | Every semester |
Detail Link | Link |
Course Information
Number of Course Sections | 1 |
---|---|
Number of Instructors | 1 |
Improvement Details
Details | Instructors agreed that the way we were proceeding with pre and post knowledge and attitudinal surveys of self perceptions of students’ knowledge base was inadequate. We created a new pre and post Knowledge Acquisition Assessment survey. We also refined our outcomes by using external data. We made the outcomes more consistent with the CCC C-ID Statewide Descriptor for this course. |
---|
Assessment Methods
Methods | Instructors agreed that the way we were proceeding with pre and post knowledge and attitudinal surveys of self perceptions of students’ knowledge base was inadequate. We created a new pre and post Knowledge Acquisition Assessment survey. We also refined our outcomes by using external data. We made the outcomes more consistent with the CCC C-ID Statewide Descriptor for this course. The refined outcomes we assessed were: - Compare and contrast the defining elements of each political theory. - Evaluate the major ideas of major political theorists, past and present, from major regions of the world towards gaining a comprehensive understanding of political life and institutions. |
---|
Assessment Data Discussion and Analysis
Term | Spring 2013 |
---|---|
How and With Whom | Instructors for this course discussed the changes in assessment and the refining of outcomes by making them more consistent with the CCC C-ID Statewide Descriptor for this course. |
Number Assessed | 44 |
Data Summary | Data collected for Fall 2013 assessments will be discussed at Spring 2014 January Flex Day. |
Planned Improvements | We plan to continue to implement our more substantive Assessment Tools. We hope that the data with provide insight into what is working and what can be improved. Next discussion will occur at January 2014 Flex Day |
Program Review Link | Yes, the above future improvements require resources that will be requested during the next annual PROGRAM REVIEW cycle. Examples: additional staff, equipment, software, consulting services, etc. |
Future Plans
Term | Spring 2014 |
---|---|
Activities | Revision of outcomes and assessment methods (measurements), Assessment (measurement) of outcomes, Analysis and discussion of assessment data and next steps, Implementation of planned changes and reassessment |
Details | Instructors will discuss the results of data and make improvements in course and assessments after analysis. |
Highlights | No answer |