PHOT 102A: Architectural Photography
Stage 5
Nadereh Degani

Basic Information

Number of Outcomes6
Number of Outcomes Assessed1
Assessment FrequencyEvery year
Analysis FrequencyEvery year
Detail LinkLink

Course Information

Number of Course Sections1
Number of Instructors1

Improvement Details

DetailsAssignments and assessments were refined for this course in the Fall of 2013. Some more post-production demonstrations and lectures were included during the semester to help students improve their photographic images.

Assessment Methods

Methods• Evaluation of students’ creative and technical assignments plus final portfolio.

• Fall 2013 SLO is based on Fall 2012 SLO provided by previous instructor.

Assessment Data Discussion and Analysis

TermFall 2013
How and With WhomThe data was discussed with the previous faculty in the same department who taught the course in Fall 2012.
Number Assessed9
Data SummaryOut of 9 students, the data indicated that 5 students were exemplary and 2 were competent in successfully completing a final project that demonstrated the ability of the students' to photograph interiors and exteriors of public and private places and spaces.

The assessment suggests that a greater majority of students in the class were able to produce work that was either competent or exemplary for this outcome. This suggests that in-class lectures and demonstrations, as well as clarity of expectations in the assignments, were appropriate.
Planned ImprovementsIn future assessments, student equipment and their ability to successfully utilize post-production techniques that may hinder their success in the completion of their projects, could be taken into consideration. Assignments can be reviewed and possibly rewritten to accommodate for this.
Program Review LinkYes, the above future improvements require resources that will be requested during the next annual PROGRAM REVIEW cycle. Examples: additional staff, equipment, software, consulting services, etc.

Future Plans

TermFall 2014
ActivitiesRevision of outcomes and assessment methods (measurements), Assessment (measurement) of outcomes, Analysis and discussion of assessment data and next steps, Implementation of planned changes and reassessment
DetailsSome revision of assessment methods used for the learning outcome that was considered in Fall 2013 will have to be made in discussion with instructor/s and department chair from the same department, and further implementation of planned changes and reassessment should be considered. Also, an additional student learning outcome could be added to the assessment.
HighlightsThe positive outcome of this review is that the majority of the course lectures and visual examples, material provided, demonstrations, as well as outside lecturers and field trip sessions that are included as part of the lesson plans throughout the semester, have shown to be relevant information in the students' learning outcome, as seen in the assessment results and the students' final photographic images.

Back to Overview