HOEC 98: Intro to Dietetics Profession
Stage 5
Lisa Yamashiro
Basic Information
Number of Outcomes | 4 |
---|---|
Number of Outcomes Assessed | 4 |
Assessment Frequency | Every year |
Analysis Frequency | Every year |
Detail Link | Link |
Course Information
Number of Course Sections | 1 |
---|---|
Number of Instructors | 1 |
Improvement Details
Details | 1. Revised the course outline to reflect new course identifier for Fall 2014 (Consumer Ed Department is merging with Health Education Department), and refined/streamlined the course SLOs. Approved by Curriculum Committee in Fall 2013. 2. This fall made HOEC 98 a tech-enhanced course, a valuable improvement to keep course content organized and easily accessible for students. Also used the questionnaire feature of Insight to gather course evaluation data and students' self-assessment of mastery of course SLOs. |
---|
Assessment Methods
Methods | Course evaluation survey administered via Insight, for students to reflect and self-evaluate their mastery of course SLOs and to share relevant feedback. For each of the SLOs, students were asked to rate themselves on how well they think they achieved the SLO based on a scale of 1(lowest) to 10(highest). |
---|
Assessment Data Discussion and Analysis
Term | Fall 2013 |
---|---|
How and With Whom | Students and department chair |
Number Assessed | 28 |
Data Summary | Overall, 93% of students completed the course with a A or B grade. Based on the course evaluation survey results: (our benchmark goal is a rating of 7 or higher based on a scale of 1-lowest to 10-highest) 1. For SLO A (assess personal interests, capabilities, and education/career goals to prepare for success in school and/or professional careers in the nutrition field), 95% of students gave a rating of 8 or higher on achievement of the SLO 2. For SLO B (compare and contrast the diverse employment opportunities in the nutrition field, and educational pathways), 100% of students gave a rating of 8 or higher 3. For SLO C (demonstrate basic elements of work acculturation and professionalism), 100% of students gave a rating of 8 or higher 4. For SLO D (prepare and develop a professional portfolio), 83% of students gave a rating of 8 or higher |
Planned Improvements | Continue to add new resources and refine assignments and assessments as needed. |
Program Review Link | No answer |
Future Plans
Term | Fall 2014 |
---|---|
Activities | Implementation of planned changes and reassessment |
Details | Continue to re-assess |
Highlights | No answer |